Jewish Digital Library
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Jewish Digital Library
  • Holokaust (Šoa) [The Holocaust (Ha-Shoah)]
  • Holokaust (ShoahLab)
  • View Item
  •   Jewish Digital Library
  • Holokaust (Šoa) [The Holocaust (Ha-Shoah)]
  • Holokaust (ShoahLab)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Memorijali ili muzeji Holokausta? Memorijal Šoe u Parizu

Memorial or museum of Holocaust? Mémorial de la Shoah in Paris

Thumbnail
2018
full text (305.7Kb)
Authors
Petrović, Boris
Contributors
Daković, Nevena
Mevorah, Vera
Book part (Published version)
,
Savez jevrejskih opština Srbije = Federation of Jewish Communities in Serbia
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Šta je Memorijal Šoe? Na mnogo načina reč je o jedinstvenoj instituciji. U pitanju je prostor (namerno koristimo termin "prostor" umesto "mesto" ili slične izraze) koji se u Parizu nalazi nedaleko od Muzeja judaizma (Musee d'Art et d'Histoire du Judaisme). Postoji, dakle, potreba za muzejom jevrejske istorije jednako kao i za memorijalom Holokausta. Sa pravom se možemo zapitati zašto je to tako, naročito uzevši u obzir da nedaleko od ova dva, postoji i treći prostor, Memorijal deportacije (Memorial des Martyrs de la Deportation), koji se ne odnosi samo na Šou kao specifično jevrejsko iskustvo, već jednako na sve žrtve deportacije. Nameće se pitanje zašto su ove dve institucije razdvojene, kao i šta razlikuje memorijal od muzeja.
The article is an inquiry into the history and purpose of the Shoah Memorial in Paris. It analyzes the very function of a memorial versus the function of a museum - and by doing so juxtaposes these two institutions as diametrically opposite endeavors. The main hypothesis is that the museum, much like the university, or the institute, deals with history, whereas the memorial deals with memory. One is organized and conceptualized, "filtered" and "purified", the other is spontaneous, organic and intentionally in a state of disarray. One stands for the community, the other for a crystallized, refined and elaborated image of the community. The perfect case study for the examination of the given hypothesis is the Shoah Memorial in Paris, as it is constituted out of both (as we have speculated, opposed) aspects that merge into the singular whole.
Keywords:
Holokaust - muzeji / Holocaust - museums / Holokaust - memorijali / Holocaust - memorials
Source:
Graničnici sećanja: jevrejsko nasleđe i Holokaust, 2018, 63-77
Publisher:
  • Beograd : Jevrejski istorijski muzej Savez jevrejskih opština Srbije

ISBN: 978-86-88113-13-7

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_775
URI
https://www.jevrejskadigitalnabiblioteka.rs/handle/123456789/775
Collections
  • Holokaust (ShoahLab)
Topic
Holokaust (Šoa) [The Holocaust (Ha-Shoah)]
TY  - CHAP
AU  - Petrović, Boris
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://www.jevrejskadigitalnabiblioteka.rs/handle/123456789/775
AB  - Šta je Memorijal Šoe? Na mnogo načina reč je o jedinstvenoj instituciji. U pitanju je prostor (namerno koristimo termin "prostor" umesto "mesto" ili slične izraze) koji se u Parizu nalazi nedaleko od Muzeja judaizma (Musee d'Art et d'Histoire du Judaisme). Postoji, dakle, potreba za muzejom jevrejske istorije jednako kao i za memorijalom Holokausta. Sa pravom se možemo zapitati zašto je to tako, naročito uzevši u obzir da nedaleko od ova dva, postoji i treći prostor, Memorijal deportacije (Memorial des Martyrs de la Deportation), koji se ne odnosi samo na Šou kao specifično jevrejsko iskustvo, već jednako na sve žrtve deportacije. Nameće se pitanje zašto su ove dve institucije razdvojene, kao i šta razlikuje memorijal od muzeja.
AB  - The article is an inquiry into the history and purpose of the Shoah Memorial in Paris. It analyzes the very function of a memorial versus the function of a museum - and by doing so juxtaposes these two institutions as diametrically opposite endeavors. The main hypothesis is that the museum, much like the university, or the institute, deals with history, whereas the memorial deals with memory. One is organized and conceptualized, "filtered" and "purified", the other is spontaneous, organic and intentionally in a state of disarray. One stands for the community, the other for a crystallized, refined and elaborated image of the community. The perfect case study for the examination of the given hypothesis is the Shoah Memorial in Paris, as it is constituted out of both (as we have speculated, opposed) aspects that merge into the singular whole.
PB  - Beograd : Jevrejski istorijski muzej Savez jevrejskih opština Srbije
T2  - Graničnici sećanja: jevrejsko nasleđe i Holokaust
T1  - Memorijali ili muzeji Holokausta? Memorijal Šoe u Parizu
T1  - Memorial or museum of Holocaust? Mémorial de la Shoah in Paris
SP  - 63
EP  - 77
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_775
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Petrović, Boris",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Šta je Memorijal Šoe? Na mnogo načina reč je o jedinstvenoj instituciji. U pitanju je prostor (namerno koristimo termin "prostor" umesto "mesto" ili slične izraze) koji se u Parizu nalazi nedaleko od Muzeja judaizma (Musee d'Art et d'Histoire du Judaisme). Postoji, dakle, potreba za muzejom jevrejske istorije jednako kao i za memorijalom Holokausta. Sa pravom se možemo zapitati zašto je to tako, naročito uzevši u obzir da nedaleko od ova dva, postoji i treći prostor, Memorijal deportacije (Memorial des Martyrs de la Deportation), koji se ne odnosi samo na Šou kao specifično jevrejsko iskustvo, već jednako na sve žrtve deportacije. Nameće se pitanje zašto su ove dve institucije razdvojene, kao i šta razlikuje memorijal od muzeja., The article is an inquiry into the history and purpose of the Shoah Memorial in Paris. It analyzes the very function of a memorial versus the function of a museum - and by doing so juxtaposes these two institutions as diametrically opposite endeavors. The main hypothesis is that the museum, much like the university, or the institute, deals with history, whereas the memorial deals with memory. One is organized and conceptualized, "filtered" and "purified", the other is spontaneous, organic and intentionally in a state of disarray. One stands for the community, the other for a crystallized, refined and elaborated image of the community. The perfect case study for the examination of the given hypothesis is the Shoah Memorial in Paris, as it is constituted out of both (as we have speculated, opposed) aspects that merge into the singular whole.",
publisher = "Beograd : Jevrejski istorijski muzej Savez jevrejskih opština Srbije",
journal = "Graničnici sećanja: jevrejsko nasleđe i Holokaust",
booktitle = "Memorijali ili muzeji Holokausta? Memorijal Šoe u Parizu, Memorial or museum of Holocaust? Mémorial de la Shoah in Paris",
pages = "63-77",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_775"
}
Petrović, B.. (2018). Memorijali ili muzeji Holokausta? Memorijal Šoe u Parizu. in Graničnici sećanja: jevrejsko nasleđe i Holokaust
Beograd : Jevrejski istorijski muzej Savez jevrejskih opština Srbije., 63-77.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_775
Petrović B. Memorijali ili muzeji Holokausta? Memorijal Šoe u Parizu. in Graničnici sećanja: jevrejsko nasleđe i Holokaust. 2018;:63-77.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_775 .
Petrović, Boris, "Memorijali ili muzeji Holokausta? Memorijal Šoe u Parizu" in Graničnici sećanja: jevrejsko nasleđe i Holokaust (2018):63-77,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_775 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About JDB | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceTopicsAuthorsTitlesKeywordsThis topicAuthorsTitlesKeywords

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About JDB | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB